Sam DeBord

  • 3 Posts
  • 86 Comments
  • 30 Likes
Here's a suggestion from NAR's associate counsel: "At the MLS Forum in Orlando, I informed the group about one way to reduce the risk of liability for copyright infringement of photographs. In sum, website operators that allow users to post content to their website can be immune from liability for infringement by satisfying the “safe harbor” requirements set forth in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA, 17 USC § 512(c)). This includes registering a “DMCA Agent” with the US Copyright Office and responding quickly to complaints of infringement. For example, an MLS may be immune from liability for a claim of infringement brought by Getty Images if the MLS has registered an agent, posted that agent’s contact info on its site, and responds quickly to Getty’s complaint of infringement by taking down the photo from the website and data feed."

TL has an absolutely great back end but unless you're spending $10-$20k a month I don't understand why people would use them. They take a nice chunk of your maketing budget to run your campaign (20%) and mark up the leads too. I was paying $20/lead with them, on my own it's between $6-$10. Then on top of that there is a license fee on the system of $900. So for my $2,000/mo I was receiving standard issue internet leads I could get myself with PPC and was paying $1,100 in fees and only $900 were going to actual ads, where I was paying 2-2.5x what I would pay on my own per sign up.

So anyone named A$$hat steer clear? Got it!

Sam: Agree. And that's a MASSIVE can o' worms for another thread... ;)

Maureen McCabe those of us who started off on AR -- or are still regular participants -- got the regular firehose of do's and don't for copyright. I don't think most other folks who start blogging have any clue.